![rolleiflex 2.8 e2 rolleiflex 2.8 e2](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71tvwGyQ9HL._AC_SL1000_.jpg)
I still have a 4x5 monorail, but nothing digital that is comparable. *Except for very specialized uses, e.g., substantial camera movements. I would do it again if time, space, and money were not an issue. My first digital camera, pre-ordered a couple of months earlier, arrived eight days later. I had my own B&W darkroom until August 2005, but it got destroyed. Personally, I really can't see shooting film* without a darkroom to make wet prints. Rolleiflex 2,8 D Model K7D August 1955 - September 1956, 20,100 pieces. I've shot enough of both to have my own opinions on that, but that's a very big and very different discussion. Le Rolleiflex 2.8 D affiche des dimensions de 10,5 x 9,9 x 14,6 cm. You should try to come up with the energy because the results far surpass digital if we are talking silver halide film - printed in a wet lab I think i have a Rolleiflex 2.8 planar model E3 but not sure as the delayed action lever is on the leftside looking from front of camera, photo of E2 in. Note: Shutter service and repair instructions are not included.
![rolleiflex 2.8 e2 rolleiflex 2.8 e2](https://www.35mmc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Floyd_Takeuchi_Rollei2.8F.jpg)
Parallel to model 2,8F with optional metering. OTOH, I think I'd be quite happy with any good-condition Rollei with a 75 or 80mm Planar or Xenotar-they are not only artifacts of a time but still good tools-if only I had the time and energy to develop film and the darkroom in which to make wet prints. This is a reprint from the factory manual, 44 pages printed on white paper, 8-1/2'x11' (210x278mm) format. Rolleiflex 2,8 E2 - Model K7E2 Successor to model 2,8E parallel to model 2,8F with optional metering August 1959 - June 1960, 7,000 pieces Serials: E2-2.350.000 - E2-2.356.999, engraved under taking lens.